League of Legends, with its vast champion roster and evolving meta, has been a staple in the gaming world for over a decade. While Riot Games is often lauded for its creative champion designs and engaging gameplay, some creations inevitably fall short of expectations. Zeri and Yuumi, while infamous in their own right, barely scratch the surface of Riot’s more profound disappointments.
Unconventional Strategies and Outdated Champions
The LCK Spring 2024 season has offered a glimpse into the frustrating state of champion balance. While teams occasionally experiment with off-meta picks like Pyosik’s Rammus Jungle or DuDu’s Garen Top, these choices primarily highlight how ill-suited such champions are to the current competitive landscape. Garen and Rammus, archetypes of older design philosophies, haven’t received meaningful updates in years, rendering them niche selections at best.
Bel’Veth and Akshan: Missteps in Champion Design
While outdated champions offer a specific frustration, more recent releases like Bel’Veth and Akshan embody a different kind of failure. Bel’Veth, intended as a hyper-scaling jungle threat, boasts potent damage in extended fights. Yet, her lack of reliable initiation tools and short attack range hinder her effectiveness in a meta favoring front-line tanks and engage. Professional play reflects this; since her release, Bel’Veth has seen more success as an unorthodox support pick than within her designed role. Besides, from Summer 2022 to Bel’Veth’s release, the champion was picked 199 times in the Jungle (with a win rate of approximately 47%) and 18 times in Support (with a win rate of around 55%).
Akshan, on the other hand, arrived with fanfare – a cinematic trailer and a kit centered around daring heroics. Unfortunately, his impact on the game has been minimal. Akshan’s most memorable professional moment likely remains Doran outplaying him in an LCK finals match. Akshan’s statistics tell a grim tale, rarely seeing competitive use in either top or mid lane. Akshan has only been picked 96 times in Top lane (with a win rate of 49%) and 45 times in Mid lane (with a win rate of approximately 53%).
Old Versus New: A Tale of Neglect and Imbalance
Garen and Rammus serve as stark reminders of Riot’s neglect for older champions, but Akshan and Bel’Veth represent a different problem: flawed designs from the outset. This juxtaposition begs the question: are outdated champions inherently disadvantaged, or is Riot failing to keep up with their own evolving design philosophies? Meanwhile, recent releases like Viego, Aphelios, and K’Sante often arrive in overpowered states, while Zeri has suffered a seemingly endless cycle of nerfs and adjustments.
Riot’s Accountability and the Road Ahead
The responsibility for these imbalances and disappointments ultimately lies with Riot Games. While it’s understandable that not every champion can be a competitive mainstay, the sheer underperformance of certain releases leaves a sour taste. It raises concerns about Riot’s development priorities and ability to maintain a healthy, balanced roster of playable champions.
Whether the solution lies in reworking unsuccessful champions or a more careful design process for new releases remains to be seen. One thing is for sure: Riot cannot afford to let these “genuine failures” linger in League of Legends, or risk alienating those who invest time and passion into their game.
See more information in the Game News section here.
